Welcome to TVPaint Community forums !

Obvious question: does a next image exist?

+1.

Peter Wassink wrote: ↑

28 Nov 2019, 16:40

only 256 steps )

Yes, but because it's over time nobody will notice - no banding!

All colour-changing FX are key-able - make sure to create a key at the beginning.

Sometimes I'm lazy and do it like this: create a coloured rectangle, change the colour in the next frame, then stretch this 2-frame-clip to the desired length of transition and click interpolate.

You just need to know where to look. On Mac, it's TVpaint.app/Contents/Resources/papers. Papers are stored as .dip, TVP opens them easily. Save as DEEP (which is .dip) again.

+1 that last paragraph! That would be so great, and definitely will be used by everybody. It's amazing, we have all this computing power now, but still stick to a workflow not much different from the one esatblished in 1928.

Which paper do you use?

Oh yes, the rotation in OOP could be improved.

Well, that last point should be obvious - with my inbetweening method, the inbetween stays in place, I draw it and it stays exactly like that. In that other method, the finished inbetween has to be transformed in some way - no problem if just shifted, but any rotation or scaling must be un-done whil...

So you want another process added because you don't want to move that first drawing off the pegs? It's doable, of course. In pseudocode it would be like: - get position, rotation and scale of existing drawing -1 and drawing 1 - calculate imaginary off-peg position of inbetween 0 - set inbetween posi...

The inbetween (the "0" drawing in the lighttable) is always in position and can't snap anywhere, not even back, because it never leaves that position. It doesn't move. You can only move the existing drawings befor and after that, and only they can snap back. I think this is the point where your thin...

Ah, I've added some drawings in the meantime ...

The thing is that the inbetween is already in its correct position when you have put both outer drawings off the pegs.

When I do inbetweens, especially those with wide spacing between frames, I first indicate the inbetween position of the character/object, just top and bottom, or a circle for the main mass. This way I mark the path of action and the spacing, before I shift anything off the pegs and do the clean stuf...

If I understand correctly, you are moving only 1 drawing out of pegs - then draw the inbetween - and then expect the inbetween to snap into position? This can't happen because you didn't tell the program where to snap to! When I use this method, I first indicate the position of the inbetween (that's...

I'm using the same TVP version, and mine doesn't crash (well, nearly).
- Is there enough free disc space?
- Is this an external or internal drive?
- Which other processes run on that machine?